I don’t watch much football nowadays. I was turned off by the kneeling and I prefer
the old style of play with more downfield passing. I was a pretty big fan growing up and my favorite
team was the Pittsburgh Steelers. I’m
fascinated by the fact that just ONE key play can and does alter the fortunes
of a franchise for years to come, especially when it comes to the draft
order. Let’s take a look at a few
examples.
In 1969, the Steelers quarterback threw an apparent game
winning touchdown in the final minute of the game in the season finale. The score was called back because of a
questionable holding penalty and the Steelers lost by a field goal. Because of the loss, the team secured the
first overall pick, which was used on Hall of Fame Quarterback Terry
Bradshaw. The rest is history. What happens if the penalty was not called,
and the Steelers won the game?
The Chicago Bears would have had the number one pick and
were also interested in Bradshaw. The
Bears did not have much of team throughout most of the 1970s. My guess is that Bradshaw gets off to a rough
start as he did in Pittsburgh, but he goes on to have a rather average career
and does not win any Super Bowls even if Walter Payton eventually arrives. Today, he would be largely forgotten. I admire Bradshaw and can identify with some
of his life experiences. I too was
pre-judged as dumb because of my southern accent. Fact is that if the line doesn’t block and
the receivers can’t catch, even the most talented QB will struggle. On the other hand, journeymen QBs have looked
great in limited action as a substitute for a championship team.
As for the Steelers, I believe that they do win their first
Super Bowl without Bradshaw but NOT the last 3.
There were not many quality QBs available in the draft in the early
1970s. Kenny Anderson was the only one
that could have been a possibility.
Their coach Chuck Noll preferred to build through the draft but may have
been forced to make a trade for a QB.
Could the Steelers have been as successful with an average QB but an
elite defense and running game? I don’t
think so.
Let’s now move forward to 1974. Dallas was all set to use their first-round
pick on Wide Receiver Lynn Swann.
Unfortunately for them, Pittsburgh picked one spot ahead of them and you
know the rest. Swann torched the Cowboys
in the 1975 and 1978 Super Bowls and won the MVP in the former. If Dallas had lost just one more game in the
previous season, at least one of those Super Bowls would have gone the other
way. Dallas also nearly drafted Jerry
Rice in 1985 but San Francisco traded up in the first round to cut in front and
draft the GOAT at his position. Can you
image the Cowboys teams of the early ‘90s with Troy Aikman, Emmitt Smith,
Michael Irvin AND Jerry Rice? It could
have been the greatest dynasty of all time. As for San Francisco, they probably win the 1989 and 1994 Super Bowl without Rice but Cincinnati wins in '88.
Bo Jackson made it known that he would never sign with Tampa
Bay, but they drafted him anyway. Rumor
has it that San Francisco offered a very good package including Ronnie Lott,
but it was turned down. The Niners would
have scary good in the late ‘80s with Bo Jackson. Assuming that Bo doesn’t get injured, he goes
on to have a Hall of Fame career in football and probably never plays in MLB. Another interesting possibility is that Tampa
Bay passes on Jackson, and he is instead drafted number 2 by Atlanta. I don’t think he wins any Super Bowls with
Atlanta, but he would have been teammates with Deion Sanders. Perhaps he does try baseball under that
scenario. I believe that the Steelers
could have drafted Barry Sanders instead of Tim Worley in 1989 if they had lost
one more game the previous year.
However, with Sanders still going strong, they probably don’t trade for
Jerome Bettis.
My last what if is the tuck rule game in 2001. The pass was ruled incomplete because the
QB’s arm was going forward even though it was pretty clear that he was not in
the act of throwing the ball. If the
play had been ruled a fumble, New England loses in the playoffs and the Super
Bowl is probably Pittsburgh against the St. Louis Rams with a QB matchup of
Kurt Warner vs Kordell Stewart. Even as
a Steeler fan, I’d have to bet on the Rams to win this one. Despite the playoff loss, there is little
doubt that Tom Brady wins the job over Drew Bledsoe and goes on to be the GOAT
with only 6 Super Bowl wins. This is
unlikely but what if New England sticks with Bledsoe and trades Brady? Does he have the same success with a mediocre
supporting cast?
IRL, both Stewart and Warner would be benched 2 years later
and sign elsewhere. Warner would go on
to find a good home in Arizona while Stewart failed in Chicago. I believe Stewart gets a longer leash by
simply getting to the Super Bowl and so does Warner for winning it. Warner bounces back and has a HOF career all
with St. Louis and perhaps they still have a team. Stewart continues to play erratically for
Pittsburgh. Perhaps the draft order in
2004 is different and the Steelers have a higher pick. Do they still end up with Roethlisberger or
do they go with the consensus pick in Eli Manning or even Philip Rivers? I think it’s pretty clear that Pittsburgh got
the best of those 3, but either Manning or Rivers probably does well as a
Steeler too. My second choice would be
Rivers, but Brady may have 2 more Super Bowl wins if Manning was not on the
Giants. Wild stuff that could have
happened very easily.